
I loathe vacuuming. When my body is as cooperative as its ever going to get, and I'm happy to do almost any other household chore, I still want to avoid vacuuming carpet. (Using pumps to create a vacuum in elaborate glass or steel manifolds is different. Oddly enough, I'm even ok with using something that looks suspiciously like an Oreck Vacuum Cleaner to move powder around in the lab.) When I lived with others, I was happy to cook and wash dishes and deal with laundry, and I'd sweep (*)and clean bathrooms and tidy up when nobody else could get to it...but vacuuming was a chore that somebody else would have to do, if it was going to get done at all.
I like apartments with hardwood floors and no carpet. I like rugs that are small enough to put in a washing machine. Unfortunately, my living room works better with a 4'x6' section of carpet under the coffee (**) table and the edges of the couches. Because the idiots responsible for this apartment building made the floors of soft wood and finished them badly, putting major furniture directly on the living room floor leaves nasty dents I would prefer to avoid. Anyhow, when I moved here, I acquired what was advertised as a high-powered dust-buster, a small vacuum cleaner suitable for cleaning small areas if one is willing to get down on the floor to do it. Considering that I only have a small area that needs vacuuming, and am on the floor almost as often as I'm standing or on chairs, this did not seem unreasonable. Unfortunately, it doesn't work very well. Brushing the carpet with a stiff brush gets the hair off and loosens the dust, but there isn't really any way to get the dust *off* the carpet. (Except for a few inches near the edge. Brushing pushes that dust off the carpet to where I can sweep it properly.) The dust-buster produces a moderate breeze that shifts a very small amount of the dust and lint. It's really ridiculous.
I considered getting a big, high-power, vacuum cleaner, that would provide enough suction to actually remove dust from this small section of carpet. This would be a substantial investment, and I'd have to find a place to put the damn thing. This is not what I want to be doing with my time and money and energy. I realized that I've been using the dust-buster once every 3 or 4 months. (I sweep 2 or 3 times a week.) It just occurred to me that I might come out ahead if I forgot about the vacuuming, and just bought a new carpet remnant that often. I don't get emotionally attached to them -- they're plain blue, reasonably easy to find, and cost $10-20. The main difficulty would probably be carrying them home.
(*) My mother gave me an electric broom when I moved into my first uncarpeted apartment. I asked if it could fly, and when she said it couldn't, I asked what the point was. Apparently, it makes sweeping more like vacuuming, by producing a gentle breeze. Very, very, gentle. Even if one likes vacuuming, this would not let one actually pick up a noticable amount of dust without a dustpan, and it's very hard to use with a dustpan because it's so heavy and unbalanced.
(**) I don't think this table has ever seen coffee. Does that make it a tea table? A game-and-book table?